🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.